User Tools

Site Tools


ben_ehlert

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ben_ehlert [2022/01/31 08:07]
behlert
ben_ehlert [2022/03/01 09:42] (current)
behlert
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Ben's Weekly Updates ===== ===== Ben's Weekly Updates =====
 +
 +===== February 28th =====
 +
 +**R&F audit manuscript**
 +
 +  - [[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EQaIFTcF_-acYU1wxfL3nmrbStT2SUPx/edit| Outline]]. Feedback welcome
 +  - Relevant R&F [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GyDJn0TIw1NvFAR_K3B5KNqL7NZO-RH3/edit#gid=1403080269|atoms]]. I'll be adding a few more "reliability" atoms and filling details of our current state
 +  - Working with Jonathan on interview questions for decision makers
 +
 +===== February 14th =====
 +
 +**General**
 +
 +   - Fixed access to the secure server
 +
 +**R&F audit manuscript**
 +
 +  - Sketch outline and ask for feedback
 +  - Go through 10 "atoms", how many did we calculate? how many could we calculate?
 +  - Determine roughly what would be needed in methods section. Possible paper to follow: [[https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.stanford.idm.oclc.org/34152373/|Epic Sepsis model validation]]
 +  - Finding references (empirical and theoretical) that justify the choice of audit [[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1r5ECbPW1rtvBY3YsDnwhpCKQtgff0CB1c0VrYheGDOo/edit#slide=id.g100b20b7a0d_0_21|starting point]]
 +  - Begin to plan the interview with stakeholders about utility of audit. What questions should we asking? Is there literature that supports what questions to ask?
 +
 +===== February 7th =====
 +
 +**General**
 +
 +  - Currently working with Jason/IT on getting access to the secure server (not a show stopper)
 +
 +**R&F audit manuscript**
 +
 +  - Sketch outline and ask for feedback (link soon)
 +  - Determine roughly what would be needed in methods section. Possible paper to follow: [[https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.stanford.idm.oclc.org/34152373/|Epic Sepsis model validation]]
 +  - Finding references (empirical and theoretical) that justify the choice of audit [[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1r5ECbPW1rtvBY3YsDnwhpCKQtgff0CB1c0VrYheGDOo/edit#slide=id.g100b20b7a0d_0_21|starting point]]
 +  - Begin to plan the interview with stakeholders about utility of audit. What questions should we asking? Is there literature that supports what questions to ask?
 +
 +Outside of research: Busy week with courses this upcoming week!
 +
 +===== January 31st =====
 +
 +**Completed**
 +
 +  - Submitted abstract for reliability and fairness audit of ACP models (Manuscript due March 31st)
 +  - Finished onboarding: Get access to data section
 +
 +**TODO**
 +
 +  - Start drafting background information for manuscript
 +  - Meet with team to determine goals and plan for the survey/interview
  
 ===== January 24th ===== ===== January 24th =====
Line 5: Line 54:
 **Completed** **Completed**
  
-   - Met with Jonathan and Siyun to get me up to speed on the reliability and fairness audit of Epic EOL+  - Met with Jonathan and Siyun to get me up to speed on the reliability and fairness audit of Epic EOL
  
 **TODO** **TODO**
ben_ehlert.1643645259.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/31 08:07 by behlert